Categories
affiliations brand classes and presentations consulting curriculum vitae honors insights instructional technology libraries open source portfolio professional activities professional experience publications references requests research interests teaching teaching experience workshops

My recent work with Que Publishing

Introduction to Raspberry Pi LiveLessons  Video Training    Que
Introduction to Raspberry Pi LiveLessons Video Training Que – http://goo.gl/dzID3i

I made some videos earlier this year.

I had the great pleasure earlier this year of working with Que Publishing to develop and release several video how to products about WordPress and Raspberry Pi. You can see some samples here: I really enjoyed the experience of walking to the studio in San Francisco. The air was so warm, and the food was so very good and fresh. It made it a joy to work in the studio and come out into the bright sunshine.

I loved it. It wasn’t until recently that I had an opportunity to reflect on my experience, and it was really healing. Thanks to Que and Pearson for the professionalism and gratitude that I was shown in that process. It was a delight to get to know all of you.

John LeMasney   Que
John LeMasney Que http://goo.gl/dzID3i

“John LeMasney is a designer, artist, writer, poet, technologist, consultant, open web advocate and open source evangelist. He is most interested in helping people to use technology to make their lives, work, and world better.” found in John LeMasney | Que at http://goo.gl/dzID3i

Categories
affiliations consulting curriculum vitae libraries professional activities professional experience references research interests teaching experience technology

ELI5 Libraries edition: Library meeting room policy that omits business uses.

Libraries, the original co-working space cc-by lemasney
Libraries, the original co-working space cc-by lemasney

Explain like I’m 5: is this library meeting room policy a reasonable representation of librarianship?

(Some) policies exist in (some) NJ libraries that prevent a patron from walking in and requesting a room because of the content of the meeting, e.g. the meeting is for the purpose of conducting business (defined as the exchange of money for services).

Under this policy, co-working in the library, for instance, is prohibited.

The reason: “if we were to allow anyone in to use our facilities for any purpose, we would be overwhelmed and inundated with people who were not paying for the service. Small businesses should support themselves elsewhere”.

Agree, or disagree, and why?

Contingency case details

Public Library system, municipal, large facility with many (at least 10) open, observed as generally unused meeting rooms, all of which fit between 10-50 people. I am interested in other cases.

The conflict

I would go to this library out of mutual convenience for a quiet, neutral, clean space to work with an elderly client. I have been meeting at least twice a month for months there. Surreptitiously.

We would meet quietly, in one of the vast, empty general community spaces (e.g. gallery) on a bench, I was chased from the bench twice, so started meeting in the empty meeting rooms, from which I was chased to sign up for the room, because someone might see people in the room and assume there was a conflict with their room reservation.

I explained that in that case I would simply relocate to one of the other huge empty rooms without bothering staff or patrons with paperwork or a request. I got a rolling-eyes response. They have heard this before.

And then, I complied. Well, really, I just lied.

I gave in and went thorough the multipage form, presenting identification, reasoning and content for the meeting (meeting with a friend to discuss technology), and time required. I came away from the process with serious philosophical reservations about the policy. After several sign-ups, essentially a initial signature in subsequent visits, I still was confronted with questions and doubts about my intentions.

My generalized response was “What business is it of yours, exactly, what I talk about in a private meeting?” I was told that it was a policy driven series of questions, and that I should not be offended or concerned unless I am doing something wrong. I was very clear that I was not doing anything wrong, but still breaking policy.

Money is exchanged in the meeting for consulting work, the key element of dismissal of the request: e.g. no meetings for the purposes of business.

I argued that everyone in the library at the time is there for the purposes of productivity and that the exchange of money has little influence on the use. I am a member of the library essentially for this purpose, co-working. It is a long standing tradition, as I understand it, in libraries. Providing space to do work safely and quietly. I was told that those people were not requesting rooms. This is when I rolled my eyes.

There is no cafe there. There is a quietude policy cast over most of the floor. You walk into the 1970s upon entering. I am not saying this to disparage the library, but rather to give you a feel for the atmosphere. Lots of stacks, a few old PCs, no windows to speak of.

I go for the free wifi and the (fairly uncomfortable) chairs.

Those exist elsewhere, including other libraries (problem solved), but also in any cafe, fast food restaurant, bookstore, many parking lots, and of course, at my office. However, those are not neutral, freely available spaces. Neutrality is a gift of libraries.

At the predictive idea that those interested in the use of the library for business could easily go to a McDonalds and get exactly the same service (or demonstrably better) without signatures and with cheap coffee, I was told by the director to go do that.

And so, I will. In particular, I will quickly go to other libraries as i do now in order to have these kinds of meetings.

Librarians, please explain like I’m 5. Am I overreacting, or is this a part of the death of libraries?

Categories
brand consulting curriculum vitae honors insights open source portfolio research interests teaching teaching experience

Who are you now?

Jedediah Higgins House, Princeton, NJ, Interior, Buddha and lotus wall piece, cc-by lemasney
Jedediah Higgins House, Princeton, NJ, Interior, Buddha and lotus wall piece, cc-by lemasney

A very good friend asked me, “Who are you, now?” She asks because I had a major life event this year, in February, that changed my life. I gained some clarity about the answer, and here it is.

I am a consciousness here.

I believe that I am a part of the universe, a part like any other, moving along, exchanging materials, nutrients, and other effects, as best I can. I work towards the end of my time, making notes of my insights and ideas, so that my experience and record can potentially further the rest of us, and their ancestry, and so on.

I am a part of a collective cooperative evolution.

Our experiences are a collective knowledge. We are just starting to see tools, like Google, whose effort is to collect and make available the knowledge of the whole. It is an exciting time in mental evolution. It is moving quickly, and becoming unstoppable. I am relieved by this. Now for the process to maintain or improve its ethics is my new concern.

What is the purpose of life?

The purpose of life is to make it better than it was. To grow what is here into something better than all of us could individually. If our society saw this, we would change what we know as education, and let people simply be and grow into whatever they would like. I did not get that realization until later in life:

I am not wrong; I am not right. I just am.  I am not everything, nor nothing. I just am.

I feel like I am a good organism, as opposed to a virus. I feel like I leave my ecosystem better than I find it. It is the best aspiration I can think of: To be a good organism; I’m a beneficial part of a holistic system.

This helps me to make many decisions. For instance, I want to be cremated because I feel like that would be just one more thing I could do, quite literally: to fertilize and help grow that which comes after me. I want to do this in life, as well.

Who are you, now?

Categories
affiliations consulting curriculum vitae insights instructional technology open source portfolio professional activities professional experience research interests

Technology and the Arts: Episode 78

“After a few weeks off, John LeMasney and Brian Kelley return for another episode of Technology and the Arts, as they continue to take you behind the scenes of the creative process of a collaborative music project. Watch live starting at around 10:20 pm ET on Thursday, Oct. 22, 2015.” found in Technology and the Arts – Ep. 78 (10.22.2015) – YouTube at

 

In this episode, John and Brian talk about updates in local arts, their adventures with Ardour, and their new plan to start bringing ideas together for the collaborative song project.

Categories
brand consulting curriculum vitae design principles honors Illustration photography portfolio professional activities professional experience research interests teaching experience technology

A splash of sunlight, breaking through as rays, to break the silent air cc-by lemasney

A splash of sunlight, breaking through as rays, to break the silent air cc-by lemasney
A splash of sunlight, breaking through as rays, to break the silent air cc-by lemasney

I loved this capture. I love this time of day, 4 or 5 pm in the afternoon, that magic hour of light. With the curtains being sunlight-proof, the sunlight has to be crafty to get in. I can always tell when it is 4:30 or so, because of that certain slant of light. Today, I caught it. Here, it’s for you. It wants you to have it. It’s yours.

Categories
brand classes and presentations consulting curriculum vitae honors insights open source photography professional activities research interests teaching experience

Review: Shepard Fairey on Jasper Johns at the Philadelphia Museum of Art

Peace Woman © 2013, Shepard Fairey. New York, NY. Photo by Jon Furlong. Courtesy of Shepard Fairey.
Peace Woman © 2013, Shepard Fairey. New York, NY. Photo by Jon Furlong.

On Shepard Fairey on Jasper Johns.

I was made aware of this event that took place on October 14th, 2015 through a friend, and am incredibly glad that she shared it with me. She had no idea when she suggested it how excited I would get. Shepard Fairey, a brilliant and rule-breaking graphic designer, well-known progressive, and street artist famous for his Obey Giant brand, the Obama Hope posters, and the Andre the Giant has a Posse stickers, was going to be talking about my most revered and personally influential artist, Jasper Johns, most famous for his flags,  targets, numbers (all everyday objects and ideas), and his major impact in the Modernist Pop movement that followed and extended Abstract Expressionism.

I had to teach a class at the same time. However, as I thought about it, I decided to reschedule the class, as I found this to be a truly unique possibility: To hear one hero speak about another hero.

On Open Source.

The talk was in the Great Stair Hall of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, and I got there especially early. Graciously, the event was free with admission (pay as you wish) and so all were truly welcomed. Upon approaching the venue, there was a table set up for the sponsoring organization, Open Source. Knowing something (ahem) about the topic of open source in software and hardware, I was amazed at the synchronicity of the idea, the art, the speaker, and the topic of the evening. Open Source in Philly is a month long cooperative art project by The City of Philadelphia Mural Arts program. More details here:

“In 2015, the City of Philadelphia will become an Open Source space, including:  An EXHIBITION of 14 new public artworks, created and on display throughout Philadelphia  A CENTRAL VENUE, open for dialogue with staff, participating artists, and the curator, featuring photo and video documentation of the project, plus interactive displays for the public  A variety of TOURS, including docent-led trolley and walking tours between sites, as well as audio guides and maps for self-guided visitors  Months of PROGRAMMING, leading up to and throughout October 2015, including a major launch party, artist and curator Q&As, lectures, talks, film screenings, hands-on workshops for families, and other exciting events co-led with partnering organizations around Philadelphia” found in About — OPEN SOURCE at

On Fairey’s self-denied expertise in Johns.

Fairey opened by talking about his audience being mostly composed of people for whom Art History was not a major topic of study. He did not do this in anything like a disrespectful way, but rather as a way to talk about the way that he hopes that his followers might be introduced in a venn diagrammatic way to the fine arts as well. He said that he was wrongly described as an expert in Jasper Johns, and while I’m sure there are many who know the deepest depths of the theory and application and processes of his work, I’d argue that few know more about the intent of Johns’ work than Fairey. He made this self-evident in the way that he spoke of Johns’ history, reasoning, influence of the art ecosystem, and agency given to artists due to Johns.

On their shared geography.

I was surprised and amazed to find out that Fairey had recently had a cooperative exhibition with Johns in their common home of South Carolina. He also noted that few other well-known contemporary artists came from there, and that Johns’ move to NYC was one particular difference in their trajectories. I loved the way that geography seemed so important to Faireys recognition of their commonality, and made me think of my roots in PA and then NJ, and how that has influenced me.

“”The Insistent Image: Recurrent Motifs in the Art of Shepard Fairey and Jasper Johns” presents Fairey’s latest series of works about the energy industry and the environment, alongside a selection of prints by fellow South Carolina native Jasper Johns. Both artists return again and again to certain symbols and motifs — flags and targets being a theme shared by both artists. Yet the two artists could not be more different in the communication of their message. Where Johns cultivates ambiguity and answers no questions, Fairey’s work is pointed and exclamatory. Both artists have cultivated a personal language of patterns that run through their respective bodies of work.” found in Shepard Fairey Returns to South Carolina Hometown for City-Wide Art Show – Hollywood Reporter at http://goo.gl/8A6cmZ

On the presence of Johns in Fairey’s work.

“Shepard Fairey’s 2010 mural on Houston and Bowery in New York” found in Love 2 Hate Shepard Fairey! | Banksy’s Girlfriend at http://goo.gl/XSNqrF

Fairey showed a lot of his own work, though I do not remember seeing any of Johns’ work in his slidedeck. He started by showing a series of prints of a tilted American Flag that became a central motif of work about the new state of America, and what the flag represents to others around the globe. He of course was paying homage to Johns’ work using the American flag, but noted that the flag would have been seen differently when Johns did it, before it was a mandated statement of solidarity used via lapel pins. Fairey makes masterful use of symbols and symbology, and this is in fact what I have always loved about Johns’ work as well. Flags, arrows, targets, repetition, numbers, and text are all used in Fairey’s work (according to him, but now obviously so), in homage to Johns.

On the concept of street art in museums.

At the end of his talk there was an odd Q&A where the only questions allowed to be asked had already been asked via Twitter a week before. Points off for this, PMA. I had questions, and the live, present audience should have the opportunity to participate. No one even knows if those people who asked the questions were even in the room. However, one question that was asked was one that I loved the answer to. The question was about how Fairey felt about the transition of Street Art to galleries and museums. Fairey’s answer was right on: The two things are different. Once the art leaves the street, it is no longer street art. The actual street art is still in the street.

Beautifully planned, well executed, and a night I will remember personally for a long time to come.